difference between company of heroes and company of heroes legacy edition

Ardennes does seem to assume that you've played the original game - after a single tutorial mission there are no 'easy rides', and no missions dedicated to introducing specific game mechanics or units - but as a CoH 1 veteran this may not be an issue.įor multiplayer, the Soviet and Ostheer armies are better-supported by DLC (commanders and skins) than the Western Front factions, which on the one hand adds variety but on the other can be more confusing and potentially expensive if you're new to the game. If you're only likely to play single-player, Ardennes Assault is a better-developed campaign system than CoH 2, although neither has individual missions as large or well-realised as those in the original CoH 1 campaign, and having several companies - each of which can gain experience - likely offers more replayability.

I don't think it unlocks any multiplayer content. The campaign structure is map-based and more dynamic than the CoH 2 campaign, and I think has a shorter average length (I haven't successfully completed it). No single-player content.Īrdennes Assault: A single player campaign, in which you play as the US Forces. Western Front Armies: USF and Oberkommando West armies, each of which can be purchased separately. This is a required product for the Theatre of War scenario packs (think Tales of Valor).

Bear in mind that the original CoH 2 reviews reflect the state of the game at release - even without expansions there have been numerous changes to rebalance the system since release (additionally, many of the negative reviews were fuelled by dramatic licence taken with the Hollywoodesque Soviet campaign, which had nothing to do with gameplay).Ĭompany of Heroes 2: Soviet and Ostheer (Wehrmacht) armies and a linear 20-mission Soviet single-player campaign (a similar structure to the CoH 1 campaigns).

Difference between company of heroes and company of heroes legacy edition